Review #255: America 250 Edition Evan Williams Single Barrel
Review #255: America 250 Edition Evan Williams Single Barrel
MASH
BILL:
78% corn, 10% rye, 12% malted barley
AGE:
7 yr 2 mo
PROOF: 117.76
COST: $40 for 750mL bottle (Blackwell's online)
For
all of you in the United States, I hope you’re having a great 4th of
July so far and the rest of the day is full of festivities and you wake up
tomorrow with 10 fingers, 10 toes, and 2 eyes. If you don’t, well then, I guess
you have a hell of a story to tell. At my household be celebrating with family
and friends, two pork butts off the smoker for some BBQ sandwiches, apple pie,
baseball, and a bunch of delicious pours to be shared with great company. It’s
going to be a general all-American type of day!
One
of the pours that we’ll be diving into is this America 250 Edition Evan Williams
Single Barrel release. I feel like the whole “America 250” thing has
essentially just become a marketing tool, and the American whiskey industry
wasn’t short on users of it. Over the last 4-6 months, we have seen too many semiquincentennial
themed releases – so much so that I finally gave up on trying to keep up with
them all in early May. However, this one in particular caught my attention and
I wanted to check out.
As
a Heaven Hill fan, and particularly of the 78/10/12 mash bill, Evan Williams
and Elijah Craig expressions always hit well with my palate. But what I was
particularly excited about with this release is that it wasn’t just their normal
bourbon that was bottled with a special label. Instead, the master distiller, Conor
O’Driscoll, hand-picked 250 barrels of their 78/10/12 bourbon mash bill to be
bottled for this release to commemorate the 250th Anniversary of the
United States. Check out the Behind the Bottle for a brief history lesson, but
for now, let’s get to the review!
Reviewed
neat in a Glencairn.
APPEARANCE: Russet copper color (1.3) thin legs that are
slow to form.
NOSE:
PALATE: A fairly thin mouthfeel similar to a watered-down
simple syrup. Big brown sugar up front with a nice spicy oak. Caramel and black
cherry build and are really pulled out with a good chew. Black pepper and a
touch of unsweetened iced tea. The more I sip it I get a cherry cola note.
Towards the end of the sip and going into the finish is a touch of clove and
cinnamon. It does have a bit of a bite from proof heat. A couple drops of water
helped cut the proof heat quite a bit and opened more notes of vanilla and
orange zest.
FINISH: A long, dry finish. Lots of barrel character
here with barrel char, burnt vanilla beans, and tannic, cured oak. A numbing
spice of cinnamon and black pepper continues to linger from the palate. There’s
a nice touch of caramel that shows up as some of the burnt/charred notes fade.
A touch of black cherry shows up late but disappears just as quickly as it
shows up.
RATING: 6.9/10
OVERALL: It’s a pour with nice sweetness throughout with
a spicy touch that consistently demands respect. While I really appreciate this
being released at a respectable 117.76 proof, I do think it benefits from being
proofed down a tad to cut some of that proof heat (just not quite at the age to
help round off some of the sharp edges at such a high proof). The candy bar
note I get is the highlight. Of course, I’m a
sucker for those rich red fruit notes as well. This is a fun bottle to enjoy on
a day like today! (My rating doesn’t consider price/value, but at $40, this is
a REALLY high value. On my website, I gave it a 9.5/10 for value. 7+ years, 117+
proof, high quality single barrel hand picked by the master distiller…I mean,
you can’t ask for much more. I’m hoping there are discounts on this bottle
after the holiday is over because I’m going to scoop some up!)
Behind the Bottle
This bottle I have is from barrel # 95 of 250 for this release. If we consider each barrel represents 1 year of the history of the United States since its founding, this bottle would represent year 1871. While it was not a particularly exciting year (the Great Chicago Fire may be the most significant occurrence that is still talked about today), there was some excitement in the spirits industry brewing at that time that helped fuel what became the Bottle-in-Bond Act pf 1897.
For
those that know what the Bottled-in-Bond Act is, I would wager that less than
50% know that a big driver of it was rectifiers making swill and selling it as “whiskey,”
and I would further wager that less than 20% of people know that another driver
was how whiskey was being taxed. A little event known as The Whiskey Ring was
directly related to excise tax on spirits and is sometimes credited as the
straw that broke the camel’s back to drive solutions to be explored and
ultimately led to the Bottled-in-Bond Act.
Prior
to the Bottled-in-Bond Act in 1897, whiskey was taxed by how much distillate
the producer made. From the distiller’s perspective, this was very unfair. For
example, for a 53 gallon barrel that was filled to capacity, the distiller
would be taxed on 53 gallons of whiskey. However, after 6 years of aging with
roughly 3% going to the angel’s share per year and roughly 5 gallons going to
the devil’s cut, that means the distiller would have been taxed for 53 gallons
but would only have about 39 gallons left after 6 years to sell. They got taxed
for 14 gallons that they never got to make a profit on! This drove all the
wrong practices. It made distillers want to sell whiskey at a younger age to
avoid more losses over long maturation periods, it made them want to dilute it
out as much as possible, and more generally, it made them want to find ways to
avoid being taxed altogether.
The
Whiskey Ring was a collusion of distillers and government officials to avoid paying
the excise tax on distilled spirits. The distillery avoided paying taxes and
the government officials involved got a little cut for themselves. After a long
investigation, it was revealed that The Whiskey Ring started in 1871 and
continued to 1875 when it was blown wide open. Over that time, hundreds of
people were involved and implicated. Even President Grant’s own administration
was drug through the mud on this one as his personal secretary was called out
by name for involvement. In the end, the government seized 16 distilleries, arrested
over 300 people, indicted nearly 240, and convicted 110, and millions of tax
dollars were lost while lining the pockets of corrupt politicians and
government officials as well as shady distillers.
The
Whiskey Ring compounded with what the public was already aware of with rectifiers
selling snake oil whiskey. This drove the public to desire more oversight for
the spirits industry (as well as honest distillers that were having to compete
with all the bad actors). The Bottle-in-Bond Act of 1897 was eventually enacted
to help restore the public’s trust in the whiskey industry. This act is considered
the most important spirits law passed in the history of the United States, and
easily a top 3 for bourbon specifically. While I think it would have come to
fruition at some point, it can loosely be tied to the start of the Whiskey Ring
in 1871.
1 | Disgusting | see my 1/10 ratings
2 | Poor | see my 2/10 ratings
3 | Bad | see my 3/10 ratings
4 | Sub-par | see my 4/10 ratings
5 | Good | see my 5/10 ratings
6 | Very Good | see my 6/10 ratings
7 | Great | see my 7/10 ratings
8 | Excellent | see my 8/10 ratings
9 | Incredible | see my 9/10 ratings
10 | Perfect | see my 10/10 ratings


Comments
Post a Comment